Comparative Analysis o f Determination of the Human Genealogy Based on the Base of the Head in Jurisdictional Criminalism

Authors

  • Otabek Jurakulovich Kuziev Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
  • Azamat Timurovich Kurbanov​ Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48112/acmr.v2i4.23

Keywords:

Craniometry, Cranioscopy, IMA Program

Abstract

Abstract Views: 64

Scientific works on the determination of somatic sex on the basis of the skull, conducted and published in our country and abroad, are analyzed and presented. In the process of cranioscopic research, craniometric and cranioscopic approaches and the existing traditional and modern methods used for their implementation were considered. In the process of studying the head, work is carried out to determine the somatic sex. This is one of the most important issues in forensic science, anthropological and archaeological research, the scientific study of general problems of human variability. The study was conducted on the basis of MSKT imaging of the skull of 27 male and 20 female volunteers who had no congenital or acquired defects in the skull of an adult (over 18 years of age). The resulting images were examined by cranioscopic and craniometric methods using the IMA program. In cranioscopic studies, W.M. Krogman, G.Acsadi, J. Nemeskeri, and V.N. The advantages and disadvantages of Zvyagin methods are revealed. A. I. According to R. Martin and H. Welcker, who performed the craniometric method on the craniometric method of Bogdanov and a number of English craniologists, a comparative comparative analysis of the study was given in the modification. The authors note that the Center for Forensic Medicine has developed a craniological blank containing 79 types of head sizes. With this, it is possible to determine not only the sexual orientation of the head, but also the estimated age of the person. In conducting craniometric examinations in forensic practice. N. Zvyagin’s modification, which included 40 registered diagnostic signs described and registered, was further informative. Its efficiency was 93.5%.

References

Fisher, R A . 1936. "The Coefficient of Racial Likeness" and the Future of Craniometry. JRAI 66:57–63.

Smoker, W R . 1994. Craniovertebral junction: normal anatomy, craniometry, and congenital anomalies. Radiographics. 14(2):255–277.

Oyen, O J & Walker, A . 1977. Stereometric craniometry. Am J Phys Anthropol. 46(1):177–182.

Botelho, R V & Ferreira, E D Z . 2013. Angular craniometry in craniocervical junction malformation. Neurosurg Rev. 36(4):1.

Zamanzadeh, Vahid, Ghahramanian, Akram, Rassouli, Maryam, Abbaszadeh, Abbas, Alavi-Majd, Hamid & Nikanfar, Ali-Reza . 2015. Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication. J Caring Sci. 4(2):165–178.

Noble, D . 1854. Three Lectures on the Correlation of Psychology and Physiology . Assoc Med J. 2(81):642–646.

Bastos, Mayara Lisboa, Gamuchirai Tavaziva, Abidi, Syed Kunal, Campbell, Jonathon R, Haraoui, Louis-Patrick & Johnston, James C . 2020. Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for covid-19: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 370:2516.

Nei, M . 1982. Evolution of human races at the gene level. Prog Clin Biol Res. 103:167–181.

Sangvichien, S . 2008. Accuracy of cranial and mandible morphological traits for sex determination in Thais. Siriraj Medical Journal 60:240–243.

Wiercińska, A . 1986. Multiple stochastic correlations among some cranioscopic traits. Int J anthropol. 1(3):277–280.

Guarnera, L A, Murrie, D C & Boccaccini, M T . 2017. Why do forensic experts disagree? Sources of unreliability and bias in forensic psychology evaluations. Transl Issues Psychol Sci. 3(2):143–152.

Liumbruno, Giancarlo Maria, Velati, Claudio, Pasqualetti, Patrizio & Franchini, Massimo . 2013. How to write a scientific manuscript for publication. Blood Transfus. 11(2):217–226.

Neal, T . 2018. Forensic psychology and correctional psychology: Distinct but related subfields of psychological science and practice. Am Psychol. 73(5):651–662.

Boer, H H De, Obertová, Z, Cunha, E, Adalian, P, Baccino, E & Fracasso, T . 2020. Strengthening the role of forensic anthropology in personal identification: Position statement by the Board of the Forensic Anthropology Society of Europe (FASE) Forensic Sci Int. 315:110456.

Wescott, D J . 2018. Recent advances in forensic anthropology: decomposition research. Forensic Sci Int. 3(4):278–293.

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Kuziev, O. J., & Kurbanov​, A. T. (2021). Comparative Analysis o f Determination of the Human Genealogy Based on the Base of the Head in Jurisdictional Criminalism. Advances in Clinical Medical Research, 2(4), 01–07. https://doi.org/10.48112/acmr.v2i4.23